Organizational Psychology

Organizational Psychology

Help with Industrial Psychology
ASSIGNMENT 04

PS450 Industrial Organizational Psychology

Directions: Be sure to save an electronic copy of your answer before submitting it to Ashworth College for grading. Unless otherwise stated, answer in complete sentences, and be sure to use correct English, spelling, and grammar. Sources must be cited in APA format. Your response should be four (4) double‐spaced pages; refer to the “Format Requirementsʺ page for specific format requirements.

Part A

1. Briefly describe the Hawthorne studies and explain their results.

2. Describe how these results are reflected in contemporary practice and work environment, providing two (2) examples.

Part B

1. Compare and contrast experimental and correlational methods, providing one (1) similarity and one (1) difference.

2. Provide two (2) examples of studies that use experimental methods and two (2) examples of studies that use correlational methods.

Part C

1. Compare and contrast two (2) methods of job analysis, providing one (1) similarity and one (1) difference.

2. Which of the two (2) methods you described is more efficient and when? Provide two (2) supporting facts to justify your position.

Part D

Discuss the use of subjective personal opinions in making hiring decisions. Describe two (2) reasons that support using subjective personal opinions and two (2) reasons against such use.

Grading Rubric

Please refer to the rubric below for the grading criteria for this assignment.

CATEGORYExemplarySatisfactoryUnsatisfactoryUnacceptable

10 points 8 points 5 points 2 points

Student provides a clear,

logical summary of the

Hawthorne study, including

the results.

Student provides a mostly

clear, logical summary of the

Hawthorne study, including

the results.

Student provides a partially

clear, logical summary of

the Hawthorne study,

including the results.

Student provides a weak or

unclear summary of the

Hawthorne study,

including the results.

15 points 12 points 8 points 5 points

Student provides a clear,

logical description of how

the Hawthorne results are

reflected in contemporary

practice and work

environment, with at least 2

clear, logical examples.

Student provides a mostly

clear, logical description of

how the Hawthorne results

are reflected in

contemporary practice and

work environment, with at

least 2 mostly clear, logical

examples.

Student provides a partially

clear, logical description of

how the Hawthorne results

are reflected in

contemporary practice and

work environment, with at

least 2 partially clear, logical

examples.

Student provides a

partially clear, logical

description of how the

Hawthorne results are

reflected in contemporary

practice and work

environment, with at least

1 partially clear, logical

example.

10 points 8 points 5 points 2 points

Student provides a clear,

logical description of

experimental methods and

correlational methods with

at least 1 similarity and 1

difference.

Student provides a mostly

clear, logical description of

experimental methods and

correlational methods with

at least 1 similarity and 1

difference.

Student provides a partially

clear, logical description of

experimental methods and

correlational methods with

at least 1 similarity and 1

difference.

Student provides a

partially clear, logical

description of

experimental methods and

correlational methods with

at least 1 similarity or 1

difference.

10 points 8 points 5 points 2 points

Student provides a clear,

logical example of at least 2

studies that use

experimental methods and

at least 2 studies that use

correlational methods.

Student provides a mostly

clear, logical example of at

least 2 studies that use

experimental methods and

at least 2 studies that use

correlational methods.

Student provides a partially

clear, logical example of 1-2

studies that use

experimental methods and

1-2 studies that use

correlational methods.

Student provides a weak or

unclear example of 1-2

studies that use

experimental methods and

1-2 studies that use

correlational methods.

10 points 8 points 5 points 2 points

Student provides a clear,

logical description of 2 job

analysis methods with at

least 1 similarity and at least

1 difference.

Student provides a mostly

clear, logical description of 2

job analysis methods with at

least 1 similarity and at least

1 difference.

Student provides a partially

clear, logical description of

2 job analysis methods with

at least 1 similarity and at

least 1 difference.

Student provides a

partially clear, logical

description of 2 job

analysis methods with at

least 1 similarity or at least

1 difference.

10 points 8 points 5 points 2 points

Student provides a clear,

logical description of which

of the 2 job analysis methods

described is more efficient,

along with at least 2 clear,

logical supporting facts.

Student provides a mostly

clear, logical description of

which of the 2 job analysis

methods described is more

efficient, along with at least

2 mostly clear, logical

supporting facts.

Student provides a partially

clear, logical description of

which of the 2 job analysis

methods described is more

efficient, along with at least

2 partially clear, logical

supporting facts.

Student provides a

partially clear, logical

description of which of the

2 job analysis methods

described is more

efficient, along with at

least 1 partially clear,

logical supporting fact.

Hawthorne studies

summary (10 points)

Experimental/Correl

ational –

compare/contrast

(10 points)

Experimental/Correl

ational – examples

(10 points)

Reflection (15

points)

Job analysis

methods –

compare/contrast

(10 points)

Job analysis

methods – efficiency

"Order a similar paper and get 15% discount on your first order with us
Use the following coupon
"FIRST15"

Order Now